porady-prawnik.pl

prawa obywatela ery cyfrowej ..

Dla kogo utworzono e-Sąd ??

Dla kogo utworzono e-Sąd ??

Sąd Rejonowy Lublin-Zachód w Lublinie VI Wydział …

Czy kadry orzekające w VI Wydziale Cywilnym (e-Sąd) można podejrzewać o działanie na rzecz firm masowo wyłudzających gigantyczne pieniądze od obywateli – firmy „Windykacyjne”, firmy „Telekomunikacyjne”, firmy „Obwoźne” – sprzedaż obwoźna na prezentacjach w restauracjach i w hotelach i różnych wynajętych salach – garnki, kołdry, urządzenia medyczne..?

Po co powstał „specjalny” sąd ??
Czy tylko, by jedynie służyć tego typu firmom ??

Reklamowany przez władze jako – „Uproszczenie i przyspieszenie procesu, obniżenie kosztów postępowania,..” … ??

Nazywane takie postępowanie jest też jako EPU czyli Elektroniczne Postępowanie Upominawcze.

Elektroniczne Postępowanie Upominawcze obsługuje VI Wydział Cywilny Sądu Rejonowego Lublin-Zachód w Lublinie​.

VI Wydział Cywilny Sądu Rejonowego Lublin-Zachód w Lublinie​ – nie prowadzi rozpraw jak zwykły sąd. Są to tylko posiedzenia samego sędziego i protokolanta, bez udziału stron.

Strony nie mogą uczestniczyć co jest niesprawiedliwością i naruszaniem praw obywateli.

Sąd wydaje orzeczenie – tak zwany „Nakaz zapłaty” [EPU].

Zawsze na niekorzyść osoby pozwanej [!!!] czyli dłużnika lub rzekomego dłużnika [!!!]..

Według naszej wiedzy 100 % takich orzeczeń jest wydawane na niekorzyść osób pozwanych [!!!]..

Taki procent (100%) nie świadczy zbyt dobrze o tej „instytucji”.

Trudno uwierzyć w dobre intencje twórców pomysłu na taki sąd, tym bardziej, że praktycznie prowadzi on jedynie sprawy na rzecz firm uważanych powszechnie za zwykłych bezczelnych oszustów i naciągaczy [!!!]. Firmy telekomunikacyjne na nieuczciwych umowach i na oszukiwaniu klientów i naciąganiu klientów – zarabiają przy aktywnej mocno zaangażowanej pomocy tego sądu – prawdopodobnie setki milionów złotych rocznie [nadal prowadzą swoj proceder przy pomocy tego sądu]. Firmy „windykacyjne” przy aktywnej mocno zaangażowanej pomocy tego sądu – zebrały z rynku – też prawdopodobnie setki milionów złotych rocznie (w okresie swojego działania). To samo firmy „obwoźne” przy aktywnej mocno zaangażowanej pomocy tego sądu – zebrały z rynku – też prawdopodobnie setki milionów złotych rocznie (w okresie swojego działania) [te nadal prowadzą swoj proceder przy pomocy tego sądu]..

Zadajemy więc pytanie – komu ma służyć ten sąd i komu tak naprawdę służy ???

Ankieta

Czy e-Sąd [EPU] jest uczciwy i potrzebny ??
  • Dodaj swoją odpowiedź
Wyniki

 

 

 

 

14 301 komentarzy do “Dla kogo utworzono e-Sąd ??”

  2. Closed three other tabs to focus on this one and never opened them again, and a stop at bondedconnections similarly held attention exclusively, content that crowds out other reading from working memory is content with real density and this site has demonstrated that density across multiple pages I have visited so far this morning.

    Odpowiedz

  8. Really like that there are no exclamation marks or all caps shouting throughout the post, and a quick visit to ideasunlockvelocity maintained the same calm voice, restraint in punctuation signals confidence in the content and this site clearly trusts its substance to do the persuading rather than relying on typographic emphasis.

    Odpowiedz

  10. Now feeling the quiet pleasure of finding writing that takes itself seriously without being self serious, and a stop at signalcreatesfocus extended that subtle pleasure, the gap between earnest and pretentious is fine and this site has clearly chosen to land on the earnest side without slipping over into pretentious which is impressive.

    Odpowiedz

  12. Honest assessment is that this is one of the better short reads I have had this week, and a look at clarityfollowsfocus reinforced that, the bar for short content is low because most of it sacrifices substance for brevity but this site manages both at once which is harder than it sounds for most writers attempting it.

    Odpowiedz

  13. Now feeling slightly more optimistic about the state of independent writing online, and a stop at trustedharborbond extended that quiet optimism, sites like this one are the reason I have not given up on the open web entirely and finding them occasionally renews the case for paying attention to non algorithmic content sources today.

    Odpowiedz

  14. Closed the tab feeling I had spent the time well, and a stop at ideafocus extended that feeling across more pages, the test of whether time on a site was well spent is one I apply silently after closing tabs and very few sites pass it but this one passed it cleanly today afternoon clearly.

    Odpowiedz

  17. The overall feel of the post was professional without being stuffy, and a look at trustaxis kept that approachable expertise going, finding the right register for technical content is hard but this site has clearly figured out how to sound knowledgeable without slipping into that distant lecturing tone that loses readers in droves every time.

    Odpowiedz

  18. Reading this triggered a small change in how I think about the topic going forward, and a stop at focusguidesgrowth reinforced that subtle shift, the rare content that actually moves my thinking rather than just confirming or filling it is the kind I most value and this site is providing that kind of impact today.

    Odpowiedz

  20. Glad I gave this fifteen minutes rather than the usual three minute skim, and a look at focuslane earned the same investment, time spent on quality content is rarely wasted but the reverse is also true and learning which sites deserve which kind of attention is part of being a careful online reader.

    Odpowiedz

  23. A piece that did not waste any of its substance on sales or promotion, and a look at trustfoundry continued that pure content focus, sites that resist the urge to monetise every paragraph are increasingly rare and this one has clearly made the editorial choice to keep the writing clean from commercial intrusion which I value highly.

    Odpowiedz

  26. Honestly enjoyed not being sold anything for the entire duration of the post, and a look at visionmapping kept that pleasant absence going across more pages, content that exists for its own sake rather than as a funnel to a paid product is increasingly rare and worth supporting where I can find it.

    Odpowiedz

  28. Thanks for sharing this with the open internet rather than locking it behind a paywall like so many sites do now, and a stop at trustvault kept the same vibe going, generous helpful and clearly written by someone who actually wants people to learn from it rather than just charge them.

    Odpowiedz

  29. Felt like I was reading something written by someone who actually thinks about the topic rather than reciting it, and a look at bondedcore reinforced that impression, the difference between recited content and considered content is huge and this site clearly belongs to the latter category which I appreciate as a careful reader looking for substance.

    Odpowiedz

  30. Quietly building a case in my head for why this site deserves more attention than it currently seems to receive, and a look at sharedpath reinforced the case, the gap between quality and recognition is a recurring frustration in independent online content and this site is one of the cases that seems particularly egregious to me today.

    Odpowiedz

  35. The depth of coverage felt about right for the format, neither shallow nor overwhelming, and a look at claritydrivesprogress kept that calibration going, getting the depth right for blog format is genuinely difficult because too shallow loses experts and too deep loses beginners but this site nailed it nicely which I really do appreciate.

    Odpowiedz

  37. A piece that ended with a clean landing rather than fading out, and a look at progressbuildsforward maintained the same crisp conclusions, endings that resolve rather than dissolve are a sign of careful structural thinking and this site has clearly invested in how its pieces conclude rather than letting them simply run out of energy.

    Odpowiedz

  39. Reading this prompted me to clean up some old notes related to the topic, and a stop at clarityactivation extended that organising urge, content that triggers personal organisation rather than just consuming attention is content with motivating energy and this site has the kind of clarity that prompts active follow up rather than passive consumption.

    Odpowiedz

  40. My usual pattern is to skim and bounce but this site has reset that pattern temporarily, and a stop at clevebound maintained the slower reading mode, content that changes how I read is content with structural influence and this site has clearly nudged my reading behaviour toward something better at least for the duration of these visits.

    Odpowiedz

  46. Came in skeptical of the angle and left mostly persuaded, and a stop at progressmomentum pushed me a bit further in the same direction, content that can move a critical reader by argument rather than rhetoric is rare and worth pointing out because it indicates real substance underneath the surface presentation here.

    Odpowiedz

  47. Now realising this site has been quietly doing good work for longer than I knew, and a look at focusdrivenclarity suggested an archive worth exploring, sites with deep archives of consistent quality represent a different kind of resource than sites with viral hits and this one looks like the durable kind based on what I see.

    Odpowiedz

  49. Comfortable in tone and substantive in content, that is a hard combination to land, and a look at claritybridge kept that pairing alive across more material, this is what good editorial direction looks like in practice and the team here clearly has someone keeping a steady hand on the wheel across what they decide to publish.

    Odpowiedz

Dodaj komentarz

Twój adres email nie zostanie opublikowany. Pola, których wypełnienie jest wymagane, są oznaczone symbolem *

Powrót do góry