Dla kogo utworzono e-Sąd ??

Dla kogo utworzono e-Sąd ??

Sąd Rejonowy Lublin-Zachód w Lublinie VI Wydział …

Czy kadry orzekające w VI Wydziale Cywilnym (e-Sąd) można podejrzewać o działanie na rzecz firm masowo wyłudzających gigantyczne pieniądze od obywateli – firmy „Windykacyjne”, firmy „Telekomunikacyjne”, firmy „Obwoźne” – sprzedaż obwoźna na prezentacjach w restauracjach i w hotelach i różnych wynajętych salach – garnki, kołdry, urządzenia medyczne..?

Po co powstał „specjalny” sąd ??
Czy tylko, by jedynie służyć tego typu firmom ??

Reklamowany przez władze jako – „Uproszczenie i przyspieszenie procesu, obniżenie kosztów postępowania,..” … ??

Nazywane takie postępowanie jest też jako EPU czyli Elektroniczne Postępowanie Upominawcze.

Elektroniczne Postępowanie Upominawcze obsługuje VI Wydział Cywilny Sądu Rejonowego Lublin-Zachód w Lublinie​.

VI Wydział Cywilny Sądu Rejonowego Lublin-Zachód w Lublinie​ – nie prowadzi rozpraw jak zwykły sąd. Są to tylko posiedzenia samego sędziego i protokolanta, bez udziału stron.

Strony nie mogą uczestniczyć co jest niesprawiedliwością i naruszaniem praw obywateli.

Sąd wydaje orzeczenie – tak zwany „Nakaz zapłaty” [EPU].

Zawsze na niekorzyść osoby pozwanej [!!!] czyli dłużnika lub rzekomego dłużnika [!!!]..

Według naszej wiedzy 100 % takich orzeczeń jest wydawane na niekorzyść osób pozwanych [!!!]..

Taki procent (100%) nie świadczy zbyt dobrze o tej „instytucji”.

Trudno uwierzyć w dobre intencje twórców pomysłu na taki sąd, tym bardziej, że praktycznie prowadzi on jedynie sprawy na rzecz firm uważanych powszechnie za zwykłych bezczelnych oszustów i naciągaczy [!!!]. Firmy telekomunikacyjne na nieuczciwych umowach i na oszukiwaniu klientów i naciąganiu klientów – zarabiają przy aktywnej mocno zaangażowanej pomocy tego sądu – prawdopodobnie setki milionów złotych rocznie [nadal prowadzą swoj proceder przy pomocy tego sądu]. Firmy „windykacyjne” przy aktywnej mocno zaangażowanej pomocy tego sądu – zebrały z rynku – też prawdopodobnie setki milionów złotych rocznie (w okresie swojego działania). To samo firmy „obwoźne” przy aktywnej mocno zaangażowanej pomocy tego sądu – zebrały z rynku – też prawdopodobnie setki milionów złotych rocznie (w okresie swojego działania) [te nadal prowadzą swoj proceder przy pomocy tego sądu]..

Zadajemy więc pytanie – komu ma służyć ten sąd i komu tak naprawdę służy ???

Ankieta

Czy e-Sąd [EPU] jest uczciwy i potrzebny ??
  • Dodaj swoją odpowiedź

 

 

 

 

14 584 komentarze do “Dla kogo utworzono e-Sąd ??

  1. Thanks for taking the time to write this, it is clear that some thought went into how each point would land, and after I went through cloudlinecraft I had a better grip on the topic, real value without the usual marketing noise people have to put up with online when searching for answers.

  2. Took a quick scan first and then went back to read properly because the post deserved it, and a stop at bondalign kept me reading carefully too, the kind of writing that earns a slower second pass rather than getting skimmed and forgotten is something I value highly when I happen to find it.

  3. Honestly informative, the writer covers the ground without showing off, and a look at enduringcapitalbond reflected the same humility, content that respects the reader rather than trying to dazzle them is something I always appreciate and rarely come across in this corner of the internet today across the topics I usually read.

  4. A genuinely unexpected highlight of my reading week, and a look at evergreenbonded extended that pattern, the surprise of finding excellent content rather than the predictable mediocre is one of the few real pleasures of casual web browsing and this site delivered that surprise cleanly today which I really do appreciate.

  5. Came in skeptical and left mostly convinced, that is the highest praise I can offer, and a look at ironpetaloutlet pushed me further in the same direction, content that survives a critical first read is rare and worth recognising because most blog posts crumble under any real scrutiny these days when you actually pay attention closely.

  6. Appreciate that you did not pad this with fluff to hit a word count, the post says what it needs to say and stops, and a look at deepforesttrading did the same, brevity here feels intentional not lazy which is a distinction many writers miss completely sometimes when they are working under deadlines.

  7. Most of the time I feel the open web is in decline and then I find a site like this, and a stop at equitybridge reinforced that mood lift, the cumulative effect of finding occasional excellent independent content versus the cumulative effect of finding mostly mediocre content is real for the long term reader maintaining web habits today.

  8. Took a chance on the headline and was rewarded, and a stop at crestpointbond kept the rewards coming as I clicked through, the kind of place where every link leads somewhere worth the click is a small luxury on the modern web where so many sites are mostly empty calories disguised as content.

  9. Skimmed first and then went back to read carefully, and the careful read paid off in places I had missed, and a stop at capitalalloy got the same treatment, the rare site whose content rewards a second pass is content I want more of in my regular rotation rather than disposable single read articles.

  10. Thanks for putting this online without locking it behind email signups or paywalls, and a quick visit to auroravalleycollective kept that open feel going, content that trusts the reader to come back rather than gating access is the kind of approach I will reward with regular return visits over time happily.

  11. Worth saying this site reads better than most paid newsletters I have tried, and a stop at aurumlane confirmed that comparison, the bar for free content is often lower than for paid but this site clears the paid bar consistently and that says something about the editorial approach behind the work being published here regularly.

  12. Spent a few minutes here and came away with a clearer picture of the topic, the writing keeps things simple without dumbing them down, and after a stop at craterbook the rest of the points lined up neatly which is something I appreciate when I am short on time and need answers fast.

  13. Now recognising that this site has earned a place in the small group of resources I treat as authoritative, and a stop at firmhold confirmed that placement, the difference between resources I trust and resources I just consume is real and this site has clearly moved into the trusted category through consistent quality over time.

  14. Thank you for keeping the writing honest and the points easy to verify against your own experience, and a stop at summitlynx reflected the same approach, no exaggeration just steady useful content that I can take with me into my own work without second guessing every sentence I happen to read here.

  15. Really like that there are no exclamation marks or all caps shouting throughout the post, and a quick visit to forwardenergyclick maintained the same calm voice, restraint in punctuation signals confidence in the content and this site clearly trusts its substance to do the persuading rather than relying on typographic emphasis.

  16. Stayed longer than planned because each section earned the next, and a look at trustanchorhub kept that pulling effect going across more pages, the kind of subtle pull that good writing exerts on attention is something I find harder and harder to resist when I encounter it on the open web today.

  17. The structure of the post made it easy to follow without losing track of where I was, and a look at enduringcapital kept the same logical flow going, this site clearly understands that organisation is half the battle in keeping readers engaged from the first line to the last across any kind of post.

  18. Glad I stumbled across this post, the explanations actually make sense without needing background knowledge to follow along, and after a stop at indigoharborstore the same was true there, no assumptions about the reader just clear writing that anyone can understand from the first line right through to the end.

  19. A piece that handled the topic with appropriate weight without becoming portentous, and a look at wildharborcollective continued that calibrated seriousness, content that takes itself seriously without becoming pompous is something this site has clearly figured out and the balance shows up in every piece I have read across multiple sessions now.

  20. Found the post genuinely useful for something I was working on this week, and a look at durablelink added more material I will reference, content that connects to my actual life and work rather than just being interesting in the abstract is the kind I will pay attention to and return to repeatedly.

  21. A piece that earned its conclusions through the body rather than asserting them at the end, and a look at petalandember maintained the same earned quality, conclusions that follow from what came before are more persuasive than declarations and this site has clearly internalised that principle in how it constructs arguments throughout pieces.

  22. A piece that did not lean on the writer credentials or institutional backing, and a look at everbloomemporium maintained the same focus on substance, content that earns trust through quality rather than through name dropping is the kind I find most persuasive and this site is clearly playing on the substance side of that distinction.

  23. Now adding the writer to a small mental list of voices I want to follow, and a look at thistleandstone reinforced that follow intention, the few writers whose work I actively track are writers who have demonstrated sustained quality and this writer has clearly demonstrated that sustained quality across the pieces I have sampled here today.

  24. A piece that did not require external context to follow, and a look at steadfastalliance maintained the same self contained quality, content that stands alone without forcing readers to chase prerequisites is more accessible and this site has clearly thought about how each piece can serve a fresh visitor rather than only existing members.

Dodaj komentarz

Twój adres email nie zostanie opublikowany. Pola, których wypełnienie jest wymagane, są oznaczone symbolem *

Powrót do góry