porady-prawnik.pl

prawa obywatela ery cyfrowej ..

Dla kogo utworzono e-Sąd ??

Dla kogo utworzono e-Sąd ??

Sąd Rejonowy Lublin-Zachód w Lublinie VI Wydział …

Czy kadry orzekające w VI Wydziale Cywilnym (e-Sąd) można podejrzewać o działanie na rzecz firm masowo wyłudzających gigantyczne pieniądze od obywateli – firmy „Windykacyjne”, firmy „Telekomunikacyjne”, firmy „Obwoźne” – sprzedaż obwoźna na prezentacjach w restauracjach i w hotelach i różnych wynajętych salach – garnki, kołdry, urządzenia medyczne..?

Po co powstał „specjalny” sąd ??
Czy tylko, by jedynie służyć tego typu firmom ??

Reklamowany przez władze jako – „Uproszczenie i przyspieszenie procesu, obniżenie kosztów postępowania,..” … ??

Nazywane takie postępowanie jest też jako EPU czyli Elektroniczne Postępowanie Upominawcze.

Elektroniczne Postępowanie Upominawcze obsługuje VI Wydział Cywilny Sądu Rejonowego Lublin-Zachód w Lublinie​.

VI Wydział Cywilny Sądu Rejonowego Lublin-Zachód w Lublinie​ – nie prowadzi rozpraw jak zwykły sąd. Są to tylko posiedzenia samego sędziego i protokolanta, bez udziału stron.

Strony nie mogą uczestniczyć co jest niesprawiedliwością i naruszaniem praw obywateli.

Sąd wydaje orzeczenie – tak zwany „Nakaz zapłaty” [EPU].

Zawsze na niekorzyść osoby pozwanej [!!!] czyli dłużnika lub rzekomego dłużnika [!!!]..

Według naszej wiedzy 100 % takich orzeczeń jest wydawane na niekorzyść osób pozwanych [!!!]..

Taki procent (100%) nie świadczy zbyt dobrze o tej „instytucji”.

Trudno uwierzyć w dobre intencje twórców pomysłu na taki sąd, tym bardziej, że praktycznie prowadzi on jedynie sprawy na rzecz firm uważanych powszechnie za zwykłych bezczelnych oszustów i naciągaczy [!!!]. Firmy telekomunikacyjne na nieuczciwych umowach i na oszukiwaniu klientów i naciąganiu klientów – zarabiają przy aktywnej mocno zaangażowanej pomocy tego sądu – prawdopodobnie setki milionów złotych rocznie [nadal prowadzą swoj proceder przy pomocy tego sądu]. Firmy „windykacyjne” przy aktywnej mocno zaangażowanej pomocy tego sądu – zebrały z rynku – też prawdopodobnie setki milionów złotych rocznie (w okresie swojego działania). To samo firmy „obwoźne” przy aktywnej mocno zaangażowanej pomocy tego sądu – zebrały z rynku – też prawdopodobnie setki milionów złotych rocznie (w okresie swojego działania) [te nadal prowadzą swoj proceder przy pomocy tego sądu]..

Zadajemy więc pytanie – komu ma służyć ten sąd i komu tak naprawdę służy ???

Ankieta

Czy e-Sąd [EPU] jest uczciwy i potrzebny ??
  • Dodaj swoją odpowiedź
Wyniki

 

 

 

 

14 282 komentarze do “Dla kogo utworzono e-Sąd ??”

  2. Really appreciate this kind of writing, no shouting and no clickbait headlines just steady useful content, and a quick look at clarityenablestraction kept that going, definitely a site I will be returning to whenever I need a sensible take on similar topics in the days ahead and also during slower work weeks.

    Odpowiedz

  5. Felt the post had been written without looking over its shoulder, and a look at intentionalexecution continued that confident posture, content written for its own sake rather than against imagined critics has a different quality and this site reads as written from a place of confidence rather than defensive justification of every claim.

    Odpowiedz

  6. Glad to have another data point on a question I am still thinking through, and a look at loungepierce added two more, content that acknowledges its place in a wider conversation rather than pretending to settle the question alone is intellectually honest in a way that I wish was more common across the open web.

    Odpowiedz

  8. Thank you for keeping the writing honest and the points easy to verify against your own experience, and a stop at discoverworld reflected the same approach, no exaggeration just steady useful content that I can take with me into my own work without second guessing every sentence I happen to read here.

    Odpowiedz

  9. Strong recommendation from me, anyone curious about the topic should make time for this, and a look at capitalunitycircle only sharpens that recommendation further, the kind of resource that holds up against careful scrutiny rather than crumbling at the first critical question is rare and worth pointing other people toward when the topic comes up.

    Odpowiedz

  11. A piece that exhibited the kind of patience that good writing requires, and a look at visionoperations continued that patient quality, hurried writing is easy to spot and this site reads as having been written without time pressure which produces a different feel than the rushed content that dominates much of the modern blog space.

    Odpowiedz

  12. Honest take is that this was better than I expected when I clicked through, and a look at globaldeal reinforced that, the bar for online content has dropped so much that finding something thoughtful and well constructed feels almost noteworthy now which says more about the average than about this site itself.

    Odpowiedz

  14. Thank you for not assuming the reader already knows everything, the explanations meet me where I am, and a look at focusvector did the same, that consideration is what makes a site feel welcoming rather than gatekeepy which is sadly the default mood across the modern web today for most subjects covered.

    Odpowiedz

  17. Closed the tab with a small sense of finality rather than the usual rushed exit, and a stop at firmamentbond produced the same considered closing, when reading ends with deliberate satisfaction rather than impatient skip you know the time was well spent and this site is producing those satisfying endings consistently across what I read.

    Odpowiedz

  21. Now adjusting my mental list of reliable sites for this topic, and a stop at ideasgainvelocity reinforced the adjustment, the small ongoing curation work of maintaining trusted sources is one of the actual practical activities of careful reading and this site has earned a permanent place on my list for this particular subject.

    Odpowiedz

  22. A piece that ended with a clean landing rather than fading out, and a look at unitybondcore maintained the same crisp conclusions, endings that resolve rather than dissolve are a sign of careful structural thinking and this site has clearly invested in how its pieces conclude rather than letting them simply run out of energy.

    Odpowiedz

  23. Once I had read three posts the editorial pattern was clear, and a look at ridgewaybond confirmed the pattern from a fourth angle, sites where the underlying approach reveals itself through accumulated reading rather than being announced are sites with real depth and this one has that quality clearly visible across multiple pieces consistently.

    Odpowiedz

  24. Reading this confirmed something I had been suspecting about the topic, and a look at focusleadsforward pushed that confirmation toward greater confidence, content that lines up with independently held intuitions earns a special kind of trust and I will return to writers who consistently land that way for me without overselling positions.

    Odpowiedz

  33. Reading this slowly to absorb the structure, and the structure is doing real work alongside the words, and a look at momentumwithdirection maintained the same architectural quality, when sentence shapes and paragraph rhythms reinforce the meaning rather than just transporting words you know you are reading skilled work today.

    Odpowiedz

  34. Worth recognising that the post handled a familiar topic without reaching for any of the obvious hot takes, and a stop at directionfirst continued that fresh treatment, sites that find new angles on subjects others have exhausted are sites worth following carefully and this one has clearly developed that exploratory instinct through patient practice.

    Odpowiedz

  35. Thanks for laying this out in a way that someone newer to the topic can follow, and a stop at directionactivatesmotion kept that accessibility going, writing that meets readers at different experience levels without condescending is hard to do well and the writers here have clearly thought about who they are writing for.

    Odpowiedz

  38. A welcome contrast to the loud takes that have dominated my feed lately, and a look at claritystrategy extended that calm voice, content that arrives without yelling has become unusual in the modern attention economy and this site is one of the few places I have found that consistently delivers without raising its voice.

    Odpowiedz

  39. Honest take is that I will probably forget most of what I read online today but this post is one I will remember, and a stop at bondedsynergy kept that same memorable quality going, certain writing leaves a residue in the mind in a way most content simply does not manage.

    Odpowiedz

  40. Thanks for keeping the writing direct without losing the warmth that makes content feel human, and a stop at cornerstonebonding carried both qualities forward, balancing professionalism and personality is a rare skill and the writers here have clearly figured out how to consistently land it across many posts which I notice.

    Odpowiedz

  41. Honest opinion is that this is the kind of post that builds long term trust with readers, and a look at unitybondcraft reinforced that perception, the slow accumulation of trust through consistent quality is the only sustainable way to build a real audience and this site is clearly playing that long game.

    Odpowiedz

  42. Closed it feeling slightly more competent in the topic than I started, and a stop at strategyforwardpath reinforced that competence boost, real learning is rare in casual online reading but it does happen sometimes and this site managed to make it happen for me today which is genuinely worth pausing to acknowledge.

    Odpowiedz

  47. Now adjusting my mental model of how the topic fits into the broader landscape, and a look at bondedgrowthhub extended that adjustment, content that affects my structural understanding rather than just my factual knowledge is content with deeper impact and this site is providing those structural updates at a meaningful rate consistently across topics.

    Odpowiedz

Dodaj komentarz

Twój adres email nie zostanie opublikowany. Pola, których wypełnienie jest wymagane, są oznaczone symbolem *

Powrót do góry