porady-prawnik.pl

prawa obywatela ery cyfrowej ..

Dla kogo utworzono e-Sąd ??

Dla kogo utworzono e-Sąd ??

Sąd Rejonowy Lublin-Zachód w Lublinie VI Wydział …

Czy kadry orzekające w VI Wydziale Cywilnym (e-Sąd) można podejrzewać o działanie na rzecz firm masowo wyłudzających gigantyczne pieniądze od obywateli – firmy „Windykacyjne”, firmy „Telekomunikacyjne”, firmy „Obwoźne” – sprzedaż obwoźna na prezentacjach w restauracjach i w hotelach i różnych wynajętych salach – garnki, kołdry, urządzenia medyczne..?

Po co powstał „specjalny” sąd ??
Czy tylko, by jedynie służyć tego typu firmom ??

Reklamowany przez władze jako – „Uproszczenie i przyspieszenie procesu, obniżenie kosztów postępowania,..” … ??

Nazywane takie postępowanie jest też jako EPU czyli Elektroniczne Postępowanie Upominawcze.

Elektroniczne Postępowanie Upominawcze obsługuje VI Wydział Cywilny Sądu Rejonowego Lublin-Zachód w Lublinie​.

VI Wydział Cywilny Sądu Rejonowego Lublin-Zachód w Lublinie​ – nie prowadzi rozpraw jak zwykły sąd. Są to tylko posiedzenia samego sędziego i protokolanta, bez udziału stron.

Strony nie mogą uczestniczyć co jest niesprawiedliwością i naruszaniem praw obywateli.

Sąd wydaje orzeczenie – tak zwany „Nakaz zapłaty” [EPU].

Zawsze na niekorzyść osoby pozwanej [!!!] czyli dłużnika lub rzekomego dłużnika [!!!]..

Według naszej wiedzy 100 % takich orzeczeń jest wydawane na niekorzyść osób pozwanych [!!!]..

Taki procent (100%) nie świadczy zbyt dobrze o tej „instytucji”.

Trudno uwierzyć w dobre intencje twórców pomysłu na taki sąd, tym bardziej, że praktycznie prowadzi on jedynie sprawy na rzecz firm uważanych powszechnie za zwykłych bezczelnych oszustów i naciągaczy [!!!]. Firmy telekomunikacyjne na nieuczciwych umowach i na oszukiwaniu klientów i naciąganiu klientów – zarabiają przy aktywnej mocno zaangażowanej pomocy tego sądu – prawdopodobnie setki milionów złotych rocznie [nadal prowadzą swoj proceder przy pomocy tego sądu]. Firmy „windykacyjne” przy aktywnej mocno zaangażowanej pomocy tego sądu – zebrały z rynku – też prawdopodobnie setki milionów złotych rocznie (w okresie swojego działania). To samo firmy „obwoźne” przy aktywnej mocno zaangażowanej pomocy tego sądu – zebrały z rynku – też prawdopodobnie setki milionów złotych rocznie (w okresie swojego działania) [te nadal prowadzą swoj proceder przy pomocy tego sądu]..

Zadajemy więc pytanie – komu ma służyć ten sąd i komu tak naprawdę służy ???

Ankieta

Czy e-Sąd [EPU] jest uczciwy i potrzebny ??
  • Dodaj swoją odpowiedź
Wyniki

 

 

 

 

13 468 komentarzy do “Dla kogo utworzono e-Sąd ??”

  1. Reading this confirmed that my time researching the topic in other places had not been wasted, and a stop at integritybondhub extended the confirmation, when independent sources agree that is a useful signal and this site is one of the more reliable sources I have found for cross checking what I read elsewhere on similar subjects.

    Odpowiedz

  3. Now sitting with the thoughts the post triggered rather than rushing on to the next thing, and a stop at progresswithoutfriction extended that reflective pause, content that earns time for thought after closing the tab is content of higher value than the merely interesting and this site has clearly produced that lasting effect today.

    Odpowiedz

  5. Worth bookmarking and sharing with anyone interested in the topic, that is my honest take, and a stop at bondedtrustway reinforces that, the kind of generous resource that makes the open web feel worth defending against the constant pressure to retreat into walled gardens and curated feeds today everywhere I look across all my devices.

    Odpowiedz

  8. Halfway through reading I knew this would be one to bookmark, and a look at trustednexus confirmed that early intuition, when bookmark intent forms before finishing a post you know the writing has cleared a quality bar that most content fails to clear and this site has cleared it on multiple visits already.

    Odpowiedz

  9. Worth marking the moment when reading this clicked into something useful for my own work, and a look at momentumarchitecture extended that practical click, content that connects to my actual life rather than just being interesting is content with the highest kind of value and this site is generating that connection at a high rate.

    Odpowiedz

  13. Now recognising that this site has earned a place in the small group of resources I treat as authoritative, and a stop at connectbridge confirmed that placement, the difference between resources I trust and resources I just consume is real and this site has clearly moved into the trusted category through consistent quality over time.

    Odpowiedz

  14. Now wishing I had found this site sooner, and a look at trendvani extended that mild regret, the calculation of how many years of good content I missed by not finding the right sources earlier is one I try not to make too often but it does come up sometimes when I find sites this good.

    Odpowiedz

  19. Most of my reading time goes to a small number of trusted sources and this one is now joining that group, and a stop at claritypowersvelocity reinforced the group membership, the few sites that earn a place in my regular rotation are sites I expect ongoing returns from and this one has earned that elevated position consistently.

    Odpowiedz

  20. Thanks for putting in the work to make this approachable, plenty of sites cover the same ground but most do it badly, and a quick visit to frontlinebond confirmed this one stands apart, simple language and useful examples without anyone trying to sell me anything along the way which I really appreciated.

    Odpowiedz

  24. Generally my comment to other readers about new sites is to wait and see but for this one I would jump to recommend now, and a look at signalturnsideas reinforced that early recommendation, the speed at which a site earns my recommendation is itself a quality signal and this one has earned mine quickly clearly.

    Odpowiedz

  25. Liked the careful selection of which details to include and which to skip, and a stop at forwardtractionformed reflected the same editorial judgement, knowing what to leave out is just as important as knowing what to include and this site has clearly figured out where that line sits for the topics it covers regularly.

    Odpowiedz

  30. Beats most of the alternatives on the topic by a noticeable margin, and a look at ideasmoveforward did not change that at all, this is one of the better corners of the open internet for this kind of content and I am glad I clicked through rather than skipping past quickly like I usually do.

    Odpowiedz

  31. Now appreciating that the post left me with enough to say in a follow up conversation, and a look at intentionalforce added more material for those follow ups, content that prepares me for related conversations rather than just informing me alone is content with social utility and this site provides that social armament reliably for me.

    Odpowiedz

  32. Worth flagging that this approach to the topic is fresh without being contrarian, and a stop at actionmovesforward extended the same fresh angle, finding original perspective on familiar subjects is rare and this site has clearly developed its own way of seeing rather than echoing the dominant takes from elsewhere consistently.

    Odpowiedz

  34. Good post, the kind that respects the reader by getting to the point quickly without skipping the details that matter, and a short look at forwardmovementclarity confirmed that approach is consistent across the site which is rare to find online these days, definitely a place I will return to soon.

    Odpowiedz

  35. Refreshing tone compared to the dry corporate posts on similar topics, and a stop at unityharbor carried that personality through nicely, you can tell when a real person is behind the writing versus a content team chasing metrics and this site definitely falls into the former category clearly across what I have seen.

    Odpowiedz

  37. Thanks for treating the topic with the seriousness it deserves without becoming pompous about it, and a stop at securealliance continued that balanced treatment, the gap between earnest and self serious is huge and writers who can stay on the right side of it earn my respect when I find them online today.

    Odpowiedz

  38. Worth recommending broadly to anyone who reads on the topic, and a look at bondedtrustline only confirms that, the rare combination of accessibility and depth in this site makes it suitable for both newcomers and people who already know the area which is hard to pull off in any blog format today and rarely managed.

    Odpowiedz

  41. Once I trust a site this much I tend to read everything they publish and that is the trajectory I am on with this one, and a stop at visioncompass confirmed the trajectory, the rare progression from interested reader to comprehensive reader is something only certain sites earn and this one is earning that progression rapidly.

    Odpowiedz

  42. Reading this prompted me to dig out an old reference book related to the topic, and a stop at focuspath extended that connection to other sources, content that connects me back to my own existing knowledge rather than asking me to forget it is content with continuity and this site has that continuous quality.

    Odpowiedz

  46. Comfortable reading experience throughout, no jarring tone shifts and no awkward formatting, and a look at trustedbondnetwork kept that smooth feel going, the kind of editorial polish that goes unnoticed when present but glaring when absent is something this site has clearly invested in across the broader content as well which deserves recognition.

    Odpowiedz

  49. Worth flagging that the writing rewarded a second read more than I expected, and a look at forwardenergyflows produced the same second read benefit, content with hidden depths that emerge only on careful rereading is rare in the modern blog space and this site has clearly invested in that level of compositional density throughout.

    Odpowiedz

Dodaj komentarz

Twój adres email nie zostanie opublikowany. Pola, których wypełnienie jest wymagane, są oznaczone symbolem *

Powrót do góry