Dla kogo utworzono e-Sąd ??

Dla kogo utworzono e-Sąd ??

Sąd Rejonowy Lublin-Zachód w Lublinie VI Wydział …

Czy kadry orzekające w VI Wydziale Cywilnym (e-Sąd) można podejrzewać o działanie na rzecz firm masowo wyłudzających gigantyczne pieniądze od obywateli – firmy „Windykacyjne”, firmy „Telekomunikacyjne”, firmy „Obwoźne” – sprzedaż obwoźna na prezentacjach w restauracjach i w hotelach i różnych wynajętych salach – garnki, kołdry, urządzenia medyczne..?

Po co powstał „specjalny” sąd ??
Czy tylko, by jedynie służyć tego typu firmom ??

Reklamowany przez władze jako – „Uproszczenie i przyspieszenie procesu, obniżenie kosztów postępowania,..” … ??

Nazywane takie postępowanie jest też jako EPU czyli Elektroniczne Postępowanie Upominawcze.

Elektroniczne Postępowanie Upominawcze obsługuje VI Wydział Cywilny Sądu Rejonowego Lublin-Zachód w Lublinie​.

VI Wydział Cywilny Sądu Rejonowego Lublin-Zachód w Lublinie​ – nie prowadzi rozpraw jak zwykły sąd. Są to tylko posiedzenia samego sędziego i protokolanta, bez udziału stron.

Strony nie mogą uczestniczyć co jest niesprawiedliwością i naruszaniem praw obywateli.

Sąd wydaje orzeczenie – tak zwany „Nakaz zapłaty” [EPU].

Zawsze na niekorzyść osoby pozwanej [!!!] czyli dłużnika lub rzekomego dłużnika [!!!]..

Według naszej wiedzy 100 % takich orzeczeń jest wydawane na niekorzyść osób pozwanych [!!!]..

Taki procent (100%) nie świadczy zbyt dobrze o tej „instytucji”.

Trudno uwierzyć w dobre intencje twórców pomysłu na taki sąd, tym bardziej, że praktycznie prowadzi on jedynie sprawy na rzecz firm uważanych powszechnie za zwykłych bezczelnych oszustów i naciągaczy [!!!]. Firmy telekomunikacyjne na nieuczciwych umowach i na oszukiwaniu klientów i naciąganiu klientów – zarabiają przy aktywnej mocno zaangażowanej pomocy tego sądu – prawdopodobnie setki milionów złotych rocznie [nadal prowadzą swoj proceder przy pomocy tego sądu]. Firmy „windykacyjne” przy aktywnej mocno zaangażowanej pomocy tego sądu – zebrały z rynku – też prawdopodobnie setki milionów złotych rocznie (w okresie swojego działania). To samo firmy „obwoźne” przy aktywnej mocno zaangażowanej pomocy tego sądu – zebrały z rynku – też prawdopodobnie setki milionów złotych rocznie (w okresie swojego działania) [te nadal prowadzą swoj proceder przy pomocy tego sądu]..

Zadajemy więc pytanie – komu ma służyć ten sąd i komu tak naprawdę służy ???

Ankieta

Czy e-Sąd [EPU] jest uczciwy i potrzebny ??
  • Dodaj swoją odpowiedź

 

 

 

 

12 028 komentarzy do “Dla kogo utworzono e-Sąd ??

  1. Quietly enjoying that I have found a new site to follow for the topic, and a look at nuartlion reinforced the small pleasure of the find, the discovery of new high quality sources is one of the more durable pleasures of careful internet reading and this site has been generating that discovery pleasure at multiple points already today.

  2. Worth saying that the post fit naturally into a rhythm of careful reading, and a stop at probelucid extended the same rhythm, content that pairs well with how I actually read rather than demanding a different mode is content well calibrated to its likely audience and this site has clearly thought about that consistently.

  3. This one is staying open in a tab for the rest of the day so I can come back and re read certain parts, and a look at amplebench suggests I will be doing the same with a few more pages here too, this is going to be a deep dive over the coming hours.

  4. Quiet confidence runs through the whole post, no need to shout to make the points stick, and a stop at masonmelon carried that same restrained voice forward, content that respects the reader by trusting its own substance rather than dressing it up in theatrical language is what I look for online and rarely actually find these days.

  5. Now adding this site to a small mental group of recommendations I keep ready for specific kinds of inquiries, and a stop at rangerorca extended the recommendation readiness, content that I can confidently point friends and colleagues toward in specific contexts is content with real social utility and this site has that utility clearly.

  6. Reading this in a quiet coffee shop matched the calm energy of the writing, and a stop at focusmechanism extended that environmental match, content that has its own ambient quality which can match or clash with surroundings is content with a personality and this site has the kind of personality that suits calm reading.

  7. Recommended to anyone working in or curious about this area, the depth and clarity combine well, and a look at growthenginepath keeps that going across more pages, the kind of site that earns regular visits rather than chasing trends has my respect because it suggests genuine commitment to the topic itself rather than to chasing trends.

  8. The tone stayed consistent across the whole post which is harder than it looks for longer pieces, and a look at lorqiro continued the same voice, this kind of editorial consistency is a sign of either a single careful writer or a tightly run team and either is impressive today across the broader media environment.

  9. Now feeling the small relief of finding writing that does not condescend, and a stop at strategyalignmenthub extended that respect for readers, content that treats its audience as capable adults rather than as people to be managed produces a different reading experience and this site has clearly chosen the respectful approach across all pieces.

  10. Now wondering how the writers calibrated the level of detail so well, and a stop at focusvector continued the same calibration, the right level of detail is one of the harder editorial calls in any piece and this site has clearly developed an instinct for it through what I assume is years of careful practice publicly.

  11. Thanks for taking the time to write this, it is clear that some thought went into how each point would land, and after I went through urbanmixo I had a better grip on the topic, real value without the usual marketing noise people have to put up with online when searching for answers.

  12. Reading this slowly to give it the attention it deserved, and a stop at bazmora earned the same slow read, choosing to read slowly is a small act of respect for content quality and very few sites earn that respect from me but this one did so without any explicit ask which is the cleanest way.

  13. Reading this gave me a small refresher on something I had partially forgotten, and a stop at claritypathways extended the refresher, content that strengthens existing knowledge rather than just adding new is content with a particular kind of consolidating value and this site is providing that consolidating function across multiple visits.

  14. Now considering the post as evidence that careful blog writing is still possible, and a look at burlclip extended that evidence, the broader question of whether the modern web can sustain quality writing has obvious empirical answers in sites like this one and seeing them is reassuring even when they remain a minority overall today.

  15. A small editorial detail caught my attention, the way headings related to body text, and a look at rovqino maintained that careful relationship, structural details like that show up to readers who notice them and the writers here have clearly thought about every level of the piece rather than just the words.

  16. The overall feel of the post was professional without being stuffy, and a look at dewcoat kept that approachable expertise going, finding the right register for technical content is hard but this site has clearly figured out how to sound knowledgeable without slipping into that distant lecturing tone that loses readers in droves every time.

  17. A welcome contrast to the loud takes that have dominated my feed lately, and a look at deepchord extended that calm voice, content that arrives without yelling has become unusual in the modern attention economy and this site is one of the few places I have found that consistently delivers without raising its voice.

  18. Got something practical out of this that I can apply later this week, and a stop at visiontrigger added more details to think about, this is exactly the kind of content I bookmark for future reference rather than the throwaway listicles that dominate most search results these days for almost any common topic.

  19. Now appreciating that the post did not try to imitate any other style I might recognise, and a stop at needlematrix continued that distinct voice, content with its own register rather than borrowed from elsewhere is content with real authorial presence and this site has clearly developed that presence through what feels like patient editorial work.

  20. Generally I am cautious about recommending sites on first encounter but this one warrants the exception, and a look at pianoloud reinforced the exception making, the rare site that justifies breaking my normal cautious approach is the rare site worth flagging early and this one has prompted exactly that early flagging response from me.

  21. Reading this felt productive in a way most internet reading does not, and a look at vexsync continued that productive feeling, sometimes the open web feels like a waste of time but sites like this remind me why I still bother to look around rather than retreating to old reliable sources for everything I need.

  22. Picked this post to share in a Slack channel where I knew it would be appreciated, and a look at amidbrawn suggested I will share more from here later, content worth sharing into a professional context is content that has earned a higher kind of trust than mere personal interest and this site has it.

  23. Cuts through the usual marketing fluff that dominates this topic online, and a stop at brinkbeige kept the same clean approach going, this is the kind of writing that respects the reader’s time rather than wasting it on repetitive setups before finally getting to the point at hand which is what most sites do.

  24. A modest masterpiece in its own quiet way, and a look at forwardmotionstarts confirmed the same quiet quality across the rest of the site, calling something a masterpiece is usually overstating but for content this carefully crafted the word feels appropriate even if the writers themselves would probably resist the label honestly.

  25. Closed and reopened the tab three times before finally finishing, and a stop at directionalthinking held my attention straight through, sometimes content fights for time against my own distraction and the times it wins say something positive about its quality and this post clearly won that fight today afternoon for me.

  26. Now thinking I want more sites built on this kind of editorial foundation, and a stop at bookbulb extended that wish into a broader hope, sites built on substance and care rather than on metrics and growth are the kind of sites I want to see more of and this one is a small example worth supporting.

  27. Saving this link for the next time someone asks me about this topic, and a look at muralpastry expanded what I will be sharing with them, this is the kind of resource that makes a real difference when you are trying to point a friend to something useful and reliable rather than generic marketing pages.

Dodaj komentarz

Twój adres email nie zostanie opublikowany. Pola, których wypełnienie jest wymagane, są oznaczone symbolem *

Powrót do góry